Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
by Amaterasu Solar
First, One has to understand that the model offered by Einstein is flawed . . . there are other models.
The model, which I say is a far better one than relativity, is subquantum kinetics (SQK). Its developer, Dr. Paul A. LaViolette (an interesting character, to say the least), started with chemical kinetics (as above, so below?) and came up with SQK after becoming very concerned by its gravitational predictions. He had not heard of the Biefeld-Brown Effect, nor the work of T. Townsend Brown. He struggled with these predictions until he encountered Brown’s work, discovering that SQK predicted exactly what Brown was showing experimentally.
Why is SQK better than relativity?
It takes no element on faith: Einstein’s relativity is based on the faith that matter somehow “bends” space-time. Nowhere does he explain (or even try to) how or why this might be. One just has to take it on faith.
It explains things without the need for “renormalization;” relativity ends in infinities without this mathematical fudge.
It integrates EM with gravity. Einstein himself died still trying to do so.
And it still predicts things like the lensing of light, the apparent time dilation, and all other predictions of relativity, plus more — all of which are testable (string theory is 100% untestable).
Read more: Activist Post